Posted: July 7th, 2023

Increase access to mental health services

Critical thinking paperYou are an expert in the healthcare field and you have been asked by GovernorMcAuliffe to provide your recommendation on one of the following healthcare proposals that would be beneficial for the Commonwealth of Virginia.The proposal options are to:1) Increase access to mental health services.Increase Medicaid Assistance.Standardize color-coded medical bracelets in all healthcare facilities.Mandatory completion of an Advance Directive during an acute care admission.Viability of the Certificate of Public NeedThe assignment is to write a 2-3 page position paper in which you present an argument for or against one of the proposals above. Your paper is to be arranged in the following order:What specific problem is addressed by the proposal?What are the benefits and drawbacks of this proposal?What are some other options?Provide a recommendation. Do you agree with the proposal or not? Why or why not? Try to convince your audience that the proposal is or is not a good idea.* Before starting the paper, review the grading rubric.*The paper should be double-spaced and you should use 12 point font.*Include a good introductory paragraph and a conclusion.*Include at least 3 reference, using APA referencing guidelines to cite the sources. The text is not to be used a reference.Name:ElementsHighly Competent (4)Exceeds ExpectationsCompetent (3)Needs Improvement (2)Not Competent (1)Not Done (0)1. Problem/PositionThesis statement& introductionClearly identified, explicit.Adequately identified anddescribed.Problem/issue present, but ambiguous.Problem/issue not present or unclear.Thesis statement not presentBackgroundBackground sets the stage & is not part of argument.Background does an adequate job of setting the stage.Background has some argument points.Background does not adequately set the stage for the current issue.Background absent.2. AnalysisPosition or supporting thesis argumentClearly stated with at least 3 well developed defenses.Well stated with at least 2 developed defenses.Vaguely stated with at least 1 limited defense.Poorly stated with no defense.Supporting arguments not present.Opposing argumentMinimum of 3 alternate points of view well explored.Thoroughly considered attention to minimum of 2 alternate views.Some attention to at least 1 alternate view.Obvious alternate views ignored.Opposing arguments not present.3. InvestigationUse of Sources materialsAll sources relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).Most sources relevant, appropriate, credible–(primary or secondary sources).Some sources are relevant, appropriate, credible –(primary or secondary sources).Inadequate number of sources; No sources are relevant, appropriate, credible.Reference page absent.4. Writing SkillsOrganizationIdeas flow smoothly, clearly linked to each other and organized under headings – Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas well incorporated into a coherent argument or solution.Ideas tend to flow smoothly, usually linked to each other and properly organized under headings - Introduction, Background, and Argument and Conclusion. Ideas incorporated into a fairly coherent argument or solution.Ideas are incomplete, make little sense together, not well organized under headings - Introduction, Background, Argument and Conclusion. Some ideas are used in argument or solution.Ideas are tangent, makes no sense together. Ideas lack connection or coherence.Required paper sections absent.StyleParagraphs with clear topic sentences and multiple supporting sentences. Variety of sentence structures in active voice. Appropriate, high level word choice.Paragraphs include topic sentences and some supporting sentences. Generally well chosen sentence style and word choice.Paragraphs missing clear topic sentences; sparse supporting sentences. Sentence style errors; overuse of passive voice. Word choice errors; low level vocabulary.Poorly organized paragraphs. Extensive slang, inappropriate language, and low level word choices.No paragraph segmenta-tion.Grammar, Mechanics, & FormattingUse of proper grammar and mechanics throughout Proper use of APA format throughout.Mostly used proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Adequate use of APA format throughout.Weak use of proper grammar and mechanics throughout. Weak use of APA Format.Improper grammar and mechanics throughout. Improper APA throughout.Paper not in APA format.5. Conclusion(s)Synthesis and ConclusionsAll points summarized & synthesized/Conclusions based on evidence/sound methodsSome points summarized & synthesized, Most conclusions based on evidence used with adequate methodsSummary points briefly mentioned, weak synthesisConclusions drawn & errors presentedNo synthesis or summary Conclusions ignored; maintains preconceived views regardless of evidenceConclusion absentTotal Points /36 /27 /18 /9**Score used for a measure of critical thinking outcomes and Individual students must obtain a minimum critical thinking score of 21 in order to be considered competentPaper Grade_______________________ Points AchievedComments:Points/Grade36 = 100% 21 = 72-73%35 = 99% 20 = 70-71%34 = 98% 19 = 68-69%33 = 97% 18 = 66-67%32 = 95-96% 17 = 64-65%31 = 93-94% 16 = 62-63%30 = 90-92% 15 = 60-61%29 -89% 14 = 58-59%28 -87% 13 = 56-57%27 -85% 12 = 54-55%26 -83% 11 = 52-53%25 -81% 10 = 50-51%24 -79% 09 = 0-49%23 -77%22 -75%Revised: 8/15

Tags: Ace My Homework: Essay Help, Assignment Help: USA's #1 Online Assignment Writing Service, Do My Assignment for Me Online - Write Academic Papers, Reliable Online Homework Help For You