Top Essay Writers
Our top essay writers are handpicked for their degree qualification, talent and freelance know-how. Each one brings deep expertise in their chosen subjects and a solid track record in academic writing.
Simply fill out the order form with your paper’s instructions in a few easy steps. This quick process ensures you’ll be matched with an expert writer who
Can meet your papers' specific grading rubric needs. Find the best write my essay assistance for your assignments- Affordable, plagiarism-free, and on time!
Posted: September 8th, 2023
Explain test bias in psychoeducational assessments.
Competency 1: Demonstrate comprehension of the terminology, principles, statistical concepts, and psychometric features related to the construction and application of psychological tests.
We hear “Can you write in APA or MLA?” all the time—and the answer’s a big yes, plus way more! Our writers are wizards with every style—APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Turabian, you name it—delivering flawless formatting tailored to your assignment. Whether it’s a tricky in-text citation or a perfectly styled reference list, they’ve got the skills to make your paper academically spot-on.
Evaluate the administration methods of psychoeducational and neuropsychological tests in a school setting.
Competency 2: Analyze key psychometric properties related to tests and measurement, with an emphasis on reliability and validity.
Evaluate the reliability and validity of psychoeducational and neuropsychological tests.
Competency 3: Evaluate the properties, techniques, and applications used in psychological evaluation.
Yes, completely! They’re a valid tool for getting sample papers to boost your own writing skills, and there’s nothing shady about that. Use them right—like a study guide or a model to learn from—and they’re a smart, ethical way to level up your grades without breaking any rules.
Identify the strengths and limitations of neuropsychological evaluations.
Competency 4: Evaluate the legal, ethical, and professional issues related to test usage.
Cite the relevant NASP principles related to psychoeducational assessment in school settings.
Prices start at $10 per page for undergrad work and go up to $21 for advanced levels, depending on urgency and any extras you toss in. Deadlines range from a lightning-fast 3 hours to a chill 14 days—plenty of wiggle room there! Plus, if you’re ordering big, you’ll snag 5-10% off, making it easier on your wallet while still getting top-notch quality.
Competency 5: Analyze the impact technology has had on the techniques and applications used in psychological testing.
Formulate a plan to adhere to NASP principles when conducting psychoeducational assessments in school settings.
Explain the role of technology in conducting psychoeducational assessments.
Competency 6: Integrate fairness in testing with ethical and legal considerations and sensitivity.
Nope—your secret’s locked down tight. We encrypt all your data with top-tier security, and every paper’s crafted fresh just for you, run through originality checks to prove it’s one-of-a-kind. No one—professors, classmates, or anyone—will ever know you teamed up with us, guaranteed.
Apply NASP ethical principles related to the use of technology in psychoeducational assessment.
Explain test bias in psychoeducational assessments.
Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological profession.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological profession.
Not even a little—our writers are real-deal experts with degrees, crafting every paper by hand with care and know-how. No AI shortcuts here; it’s all human skill, backed by thorough research and double-checked for uniqueness. You’re getting authentic work that stands out for all the right reasons.
Toggle DrawerContextThe Assessment Context document contains additional information about evaluating psychological tests covering the following topics:
Achievement and Aptitude Testing.
Test Bias and Fairness.
Neuropsychological Evaluation.
Toggle DrawerQuestions to Consider To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
What is the role of psychoeducational assessment in schools?
What types of standardized and nonstandardized tests are used commonly in schools?
For what reasons would a cognitive (intelligence) test be administered in a school?
What are the strengths and limitations of intelligence tests?
What do neuropsychological evaluations measure?
For what reasons would a neuropsychological evaluation be conducted?
What are the psychometric properties of neuropsychological tests?
What are the potential uses of neuropsychological evaluations in schools?
What NASP professional standards need to be considered when conducted psychoeducational assessments in schools?
Toggle DrawerResourcesRequired Resources - The following resources are required to complete the assessment. Internet Resources Access the following resources by clicking the links provided. Please note that URLs change frequently. Permissions for the following links have been either granted or deemed appropriate for educational use at the time of course publication.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Principles for professional ethics. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards/1_%20Ethical%20Principles.pdf
SHOW LESS Suggested Resources The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Domino, G., & Domino, M. L. (2006).Psychological testing: An introduction(2nd ed.). Cambridge, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter 5, "Cognition."
Chapter 13, "Testing in the Schools."
Cleary, M. J., & Scott, A. J. (2011, January).Developments in clinical neuropsychology: Implications for school psychological services.Journal of School Health, 81(1), 1-7.
Our writers are Ph.D.-level pros who live for nailing the details—think deep research and razor-sharp arguments. We pair that with top plagiarism tools, free revisions to tweak anything you need, and fast turnarounds that don’t skimp on quality. Your research paper won’t just shine—it’ll set the bar.
Decker, S. L., Hale, J. B., & Flanagan, D. P. (2013, March).Professional practice issues in the assessment of cognitive functioning for educational applications.Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 300-313.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004, January).General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1) 162-173.
Wodrich, D. L., Spencer, M. L. S., & Daley, K. B. (2006, September).Combining RTI and psychoeducational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise.Psychology in the Schools, 43(7), 797-806.
Course Library GuideA Capella University library guide has been created specifically for your use in this course. You are encouraged to refer to the resources in the PSY-FP7610 - Tests and Measurements Library Guide to help direct your research.Internet ResourcesAccess the following resources by clicking the links provided. Please note that URLs change frequently. Permissions for the following links have been either granted or deemed appropriate for educational use at the time of course publication.
You’re in good hands with degree-holding pros—many rocking Master’s or higher—who’ve crushed our tough vetting tests in writing and their fields. They’re your partners in this, hitting tight deadlines and academic standards with ease, all while tailoring every essay to your exact needs. No matter the topic, they’ve got the chops to make it stellar.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010).NASP professional standards. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards.aspx
Plucker, J. A. (Ed.). (2013).Human intelligence: Historical influences, current controversies, teaching resources. Retrieved from http://www.intelltheory.com/index.shtml
Pearson Education. (2014).Pearson assessment. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com
PAR, Inc. (2012).PAR: Psychological assessment resources. Retrieved from http://www4.parinc.com/Default.aspx
100%—we promise! Every paper’s written fresh from scratch—no AI, no copying—just solid research and proper citations from our expert writers. You can even request a plagiarism report to see it’s 95%+ unique, giving you total confidence it’s submission-ready and one-of-a-kind.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (2014).The Riverside Publishing Company. Retrieved from http://www.riversidepublishing.com
WPS. (2014).Western Psychological Services. Retrieved from http://www.wpspublish.com/app
Assessment Instructions Scenario -
Suppose you are employed as a consulting psychologist by a school system. They need your assistance with developing a process to identify elementary school students in need of academic intervention and special education services. You are asked to make recommendations regarding the selection of tests at the prereferral level. The tests would be administered to all students (prior to referring to special education), in order to identify those students who are performing below grade level in reading, and are in need academic intervention.
Yep—APA, Turabian, IEEE, Chicago, MLA, whatever you throw at us! Our writers nail every detail of your chosen style, matching your guidelines down to the last comma and period. It’s all about making sure your paper fits academic expectations perfectly, no sweat.
Some students have already received reading intervention, but are not making progress. So, you are also asked to recommend a battery of tests to determine whether each of these students has a learning disability and is need of special education services.
Based on the suggested resources and additional scholarly sources you have located, write a paper that addresses the requests prompted by this scenario. You are encouraged to refer to scholarly sources from the Capella library to complete your research. The Mental Measurements Yearbook Database is a recommended source of information on applicable tests. (Use the Capella University Library: Psychology Databases link in the Resources to access the Mental Measurements Yearbook Database.)Complete all three parts of the assessment below: Part One: Prereferral Assessment Identify the standardized and/or nonstandardized (criterion-based) test(s) you would administer to all students, in order to identify those in need of reading intervention. Consider the points outlined below as you make your selections. Once you have located your test(s), you may use test publisher Web sites as sources to find out additional information about them. Write an explanation of your test selection(s), addressing the following points for each test you have chosen:
What examiner qualifications are needed to administer the test?
What school staff in a typical elementary school will be qualified to administer the test?
What is the estimated time it will take to administer and score the test?
What does the test measure?
Does the test provide adequate information for you to determine which students are in need of reading intervention?
What are the psychometric properties of the test (reliability, validity, and norms)?
Are there any concerns about test bias and fairness with specific populations?
How will you use technology in the administration, scoring, and/or interpretation of your test? What ethical principles concerning the use of this technology should you consider?
Based upon the test results, what criteria will you use to determine which students are in need of reading intervention?
Part Two: Special Education Assessment For Part Two of this assessment, make your recommendations for those students who are not making reading progress despite receiving intervention. Select a battery of tests to determine which students may be in need of special education services due to a possible specific learning disability in reading. Based on your research, address the following:
What criteria will you use to determine when students are not making progress despite receiving reading intervention?
What standardized cognitive (intelligence) test(s) will you use to assist you in assessing the presence of a learning disability?
What standardized neuropsychological test (if any) will you use to assist you in assessing the presence of a learning disability? If you do not select a neuropsychological test as part of your assessment battery, provide a rationale including the advantages and disadvantages of using such a test in a school setting.
What standardized educational achievement test will you use to assess reading skills?
For each test you select as part of your battery, provide a rationale for selecting the test by considering the following:
Intended purpose.
Intended age ranges.
Examiner qualifications and cost (you may use the test publisher's Web site as a source).
Time and ease of administration.
Use of technology (consider availability).
Psychometric properties (norms, reliability, and validity).
Test bias and fairness.
Part Three: NASP Professional Standards Cite and explain all ethical standards from the NASP Principles for Professional Ethics (linked in the Resources) that need to be followed when conducting psychoeducational assessments in schools, with focus on the standards regarding the use of technology in these assessments. Address the specific standards under the broad ethical principles listed below. Explain the steps you will take to adhere to each relevant standard:
Absolutely—life happens, and we’re flexible! Chat with your writer anytime through our system to update details, tweak the focus, or add new requirements, and they’ll pivot fast to keep your paper on point. It’s all about making sure the final draft is exactly what you need, no stress involved.
Principle 1.1: Autonomy and Self-Determination (Consent and Assent).
Principle 1.2: Privacy and Confidentiality.
Principle 1.3: Fairness and Justice.
Principle 2.1: Competence.
Principle 2.3: Responsible Assessment and Intervention Practices.
Principle 2.5: Responsible Use of Materials.
Additional Requirements
APA style and formatting: Your paper must be formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting, including the following: Include a title page and reference list. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font. APA expectations for scholarly writing include the use of third-person narrative, unless it is awkward to do so. However, because you are talking about yourself in this paper, you may write in the first person.
Resources: Your reference materials may be sourced from the suggested resources as well as your own research in the scholarly literature of the field.
Document format: Submit your paper as a Word document.
Length: Your assessment should be10-12 typed, double-spaced pages in length. (The length excludes the title page and reference list.)
You Want The Best Grades and That’s What We Deliver
Our top essay writers are handpicked for their degree qualification, talent and freelance know-how. Each one brings deep expertise in their chosen subjects and a solid track record in academic writing.
We offer the lowest possible pricing for each research paper while still providing the best writers;no compromise on quality. Our costs are fair and reasonable to college students compared to other custom writing services.
You’ll never get a paper from us with plagiarism or that robotic AI feel. We carefully research, write, cite and check every final draft before sending it your way.