Posted: December 21st, 2022

Discussion 1: Interpreting and Applying Statutes”, law homework help

Question description

Discussion 1: Interpreting and Applying Statutes"

What Citation Formats Do You Support?

We hear “Can you write in APA or MLA?” all the time—and the answer’s a big yes, plus way more! Our writers are wizards with every style—APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Turabian, you name it—delivering flawless formatting tailored to your assignment. Whether it’s a tricky in-text citation or a perfectly styled reference list, they’ve got the skills to make your paper academically spot-on.

Some states have statutes which say that breach of the statute is negligence
per se. This means that proof of a statutory violation is conclusive on the
issue of an actor’s duty and breach.But even in some of these
jurisdictions, the jury will listen to an “excuse,” such as a landlord’s lack of
notice of a defect as in the Sikora v. Wenzel case at 727 N.E. 2d 1277 (Ohio
2000) and at p. 148 of your textbook. Here, the second owner of condominium
building had no notice that the building’s Certificate of Occupancy was issued
without re-inspection, after plans were modified by first owner, to add decks. A
deck collapsed and Sikora, a guest, was injured. An engineer concluded that the
deck collapsed from improper construction and design, in violation of Ohio Basic
Building Code.
Part
A: Discuss whether or not a state’s statutory scheme should ever
allow for excuses, such as a lack of notice, to be accepted to avoid a finding
of negligence for building code violations, which result in injury.
Part
B: Discuss whether or not states should draft public safety
statutes on such topics as electrical fire safety, or use of smoke alarms, or
sterilization of needles, or DUI, as strict liability statutes. Strict liability
means that negligence is attributed regardless of fault and regardless of
excuses.

If you need help with completing discussions please click here for more information.
 

"Discussion 2: Compliance with Custom"

In the classic T.J. Hooper case at 60 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1932) and at p. 155
in your textbook, the court discusses the relevance of “industry custom” in
determining negligence. Here, the court held the tugboat TJ Hooper
liable for sunken barges, because they did not seek shelter in a storm and were
not equipped with radio receivers to receive the weather reports. At that time,
there was no industry-wide custom among coastal carriers to equip their tugs
with radio receivers. The court discounted this custom and said: “Courts must in
the end say what is required; there are precautions so imperative (important)
that even their universal disregard will not excuse their omission.” The statute
at the time called only for a transmitting radio to call for help, but not a
radio receiver to get news.Discuss whether or not you believe that the
court was right in ruling the tugboat “unseaworthy” and thus negligent, for not
having radio receivers when it was neither a statute, nor a custom in the
industry to have radio receivers.Can this case be used as precedent for
the court to rule a corporation as negligent for not providing or possessing the
latest technology, such as car back up cameras and security systems to prevent
data breaches?Do you agree that “The court must in the end say what is
required” or should these types of rules be made by the legislature?

Tags: Ace-myhomework Assignment, Affordable College Homework, APA Citation Assignment Help, Custom Essay Writing