Posted: November 18th, 2022

Arguments on abortion, philosophy homework help

Question description

http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phil-2222/warren.pdfvs.http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htmReview the debate between these two authors. First, carefully present the authors’ views. What are the authors’ main conclusions? What are the premises that support these conclusions? What are some reasons to believe that the premises are true? Next, object to one author’s argument. Why is the argument invalid (the conclusion does not follow from the premises) or why is one of the premises false? Finally, conclude by explaining the significance of your finding (i.e., what should believe or do?)Length ~1200 words, standard format, works cited page (there is no expectation that you use outside sources), and double-spaced. Please do not use silly fonts, strange spacing, irregular margins, etc.Intro:Functions of the introduction: motivate the project (why does this paper matter), thesis (what I will argue), roadmap (what are the steps taken in this paper),Thesis: you may bold or italicize your thesis. It is appropriate to say, “I will argue...” or “This paper will argue…”The thesis is a contract between you and the reader.Criteria of a good thesis: 1) specific 2) controversial 3) plausible (defensible)4) value-added (novel contribution).Example of a bad thesis:Schulmannthinksgay marriage is wrong.(Vague, non-controversial, no new contribution).Better thesis: I will argue that utilitarianism’s demands of impartiality are implausible given human psychological constraints, particularly with regard to familial commitments and limited imaginative empathy.Body:Clearly convey the position(s) you are considering. What is the central point of the author? How do they support this central point?Transitions and Signposts: tell the readerwhat has been statedandwhat will be argued next. “It has been shown that X holds position Y for reasons A and B. Next, objections to A and B will be considered.”Original contribution: after clearlypresenting the positions, provide an original critique (e.g., showwhy the argument doesn’t follow from the premises orwhy one of the premises is false). Thought experiments maybe useful here.Basic Structure: Intro, position 1, position 2, original contribution (objection), conclusionGeneral Tips: Clarity is King/Queen, avoid rhetorical questions, use peer review, and explain!Introduce quotes. You must write, for example, Sullivan states, “….”Rather than starting a sentence with the quote“I will argue Goldman” is not grammatically sound. State “I will argue for/against Goldman’s view that…”Grading Criteria:Clarity of Exposition (40%)–proper spelling grammar and syntax, well organized, fluid and logical transitionsAccuracy of Presentation (40%) – careful and accurate recapitulation of the author’s argumentOriginal Contribution (20%) - substantive, well-developed, original

Tags: Best Essays UK, Dissertation Topic Help, Do my essay assignment in Ireland, Essay for sale Australia