Primary Discussion Response is due by Friday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Tuesday (11:59:59pm Central).  Part 1  Having experienced a robust debate discussion regarding if these two laws should be flexible, it is time to shift gears a bit and consider the broader implications of changing laws from an ethical and philosophical perspective. Read this article to frame this week’s discussion. Complete the following: •What is your initial perspective after reading the article?  •Based on your review of the article, is there an ethical/philosophical consideration that supports/ challenges the article’s considerations?   Part 2: Based on the first initial of your last name: •First initial M-Z: provide an argument ‘FOR’ there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws. Submit your position by posting in the Unit 2 Debate forum, under the ‘FOR’ topic.   •First initial A-L: provide an argument ‘AGAINST’ there being an ethical/philosophical reasoning for changing laws. Submit your position by posting in the Unit 2 Debate forum, under the ‘AGAINST’ topic.  In both considerations, provide research that supports your assertions.   Responses to Other Students: Review the opposing thread comments. Respond to at least two of your classmates in the opposing thread with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening.

100% Plagiarism-Free
PhD & Master's Writers
On-Time Delivery
Free Unlimited Revisions
APA / Harvard / MLA
256-bit SSL Secure
Verified Academic Expert
This article was written and reviewed by a verified academic professional with postgraduate qualifications. All content is original, evidence-based, and written to assist students in Australia, UK, UAE, Kuwait, Canada, and USA.

Frequently Asked Questions