Module 3 Assignment

Module 3 Assignment i
• Due Jul 13 by 11:59pm
• Points 20
• Submitting an external tool (Turnitin)
Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment
________________________________________
For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4 page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.
A. Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are randomized clinical trials. Only one opinion article may be included.
B. Read the peer- reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.
C. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded.
D. Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template located in Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources.
Submission Instructions:
• The introduction is original work and logically organized.
• The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
• Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
• Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET.

Grading Rubric
________________________________________
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Essay/Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification of Main Issues/Problems Distinguished – 4 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. Excellent – 3 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. Fair – 2 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. Poor – 1 point
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 4 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems Distinguished – 4 points
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Excellent – 3 points
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. Fair – 2 points
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Poor – 1 point
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 4 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding Distinguished – 4 points
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. Excellent – 3 points
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Fair – 2 points
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Poor – 1 point
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 4 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature Distinguished – 4 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. Excellent – 3 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Fair – 2 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Poor – 1 point
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. 4 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Distinguished – 4 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Excellent – 3 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. Fair – 2 points
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. Poor – 1 point
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 4 points
Total Points 20

Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________

Author Journal
Name/ Year of Publication Research Design Sample Size Outcome Variables Measured Quality
(A, B, C) Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion