Are community-based correctional/treatment programs more effective than incarceration? Explain your reasoning and provide supporting evidence for your argument. Finally, provide an example of an evidence-based practice in community-based programming or in a correctional institution that supports your side of the argument.
Get a Custom-Written Paper Delivered to Your Inbox
Our subject-specialist writers craft plagiarism-free, rubric-matched papers from scratch — available for students in Australia, UK, UAE, Kuwait, Canada and USA.
Chapters 7 and 8.
Australia Assessments Writers Are Online Right Now
Thousands of students at universities from RMIT to UCL to AUM Kuwait submit with confidence using our expert writing service. Human-written, Turnitin-safe, on time.
______________________-
Community-based correctional/treatment programs can be more effective than incarceration in certain cases, particularly for non-violent offenders and those with substance abuse or mental health issues. The reasoning behind this is that community-based programs focus on rehabilitation and reintegration into society, rather than punishment. They provide offenders with the necessary support, resources, and guidance to address the underlying issues that contributed to their criminal behavior, which can lead to a lower rate of recidivism.
Supporting evidence for the effectiveness of community-based programs can be found in various studies and research. For example, a meta-analysis conducted by the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP) found that community-based programs were more cost-effective than incarceration and led to a reduction in recidivism rates (source: https://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/1102/Wsipp_Adult-Criminal-Justice-Evidence-Based-Practices-A-Review-of-the-Literature-and-Assessment-of-Washington-State-Programs_Full-Report.pdf). Another study published in the Journal of Criminal Justice found that offenders who participated in community-based programs had a lower risk of reoffending compared to those who were incarcerated (source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235209000934).
An example of an evidence-based practice in community-based programming is the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model. The RNR model is a widely recognized and evidence-based approach to offender rehabilitation that focuses on three core principles:
Risk Principle: Match the level of intervention to the offender’s risk of reoffending.
Needs Principle: Target the offender’s criminogenic needs, which are factors that contribute to criminal behavior.
Responsivity Principle: Use interventions that are tailored to the offender’s learning style, motivation, and abilities.
By adhering to these principles, community-based programs can effectively address the factors that contribute to criminal behavior and reduce the likelihood of recidivism. The RNR model has been implemented in various community-based programs, such as probation and parole supervision, drug courts, and cognitive-behavioral therapy programs, and has been shown to be effective in reducing recidivism rates (source: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rsk-nd-rspnsvty/index-en.aspx).
In conclusion, community-based correctional/treatment programs can be more effective than incarceration in certain cases, as they focus on rehabilitation and reintegration, addressing the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior. Evidence-based practices, such as the RNR model, further support the effectiveness of community-based programs in reducing recidivism rates.